Little Woody Riding Hood (1962) [N/A]

Featuring:
Daws Butler, Grace Stafford

Written by:
Dalton Sandifer

Directed by:
Paul J. Smith, Jack Hannah


Release Date:
September 24, 1962

Original Title:
Little Woody Riding Hood

Genres:
Animation

Production Companies:
Walter Lantz Productions

Production Countries:
United States of America

Ratings / Certifications:
 N/A

Runtime: 6

Woody's take on the story of Little Red Riding Hood, but Gabby Gator tries to steal the wolf's part.

Was very fond of Woody Woodpecker and his cartoons as a child. Still get much enjoyment out of them now as a young adult, even if there are more interesting in personality cartoon characters and better overall cartoons.That is in no way knocking Woody, because many of his cartoons are a lot of fun to watch and more and also still like him a lot as a character. As great a story 'Little Red Riding Hood' is, it has been done to death in animation, this is not even the only Woody Woodpecker cartoon based on the story, and there is not an awful lot done to make it fresh even with Gabby Gator in the role of the wolf. 'Little Woody Riding Hood' is by quite some way one of their weaker pairings, largely because Jack Hannah did such a great job (even with less than great animation) with his outings with the duo. Whereas this was done by Paul J. Smith, who doesn't bring anywhere near as much as the same sparkle.'Little Woody Riding Hood' has good points in its favour. The music however is bouncy, energetic and very lushly orchestrated, not only synchronising and fitting with the action very well but enhancing it. The voice acting is good from both Grace Stafford and Daws Butler.Energy and amusing moments are too far and between but they are there, likewise with the odd nice colour.Otherwise, 'Little Woody Riding Hood' doesn't have an awful lot to recommend. Woody's comic timing has been much stronger elsewhere and his personality is too subdued somewhat. Jack Hannah did a great job with Gabby in his cartoons, here Gabby with Smith directing is rather dumbed down and his dumbness almost gets too silly rather than crafty.Generally there is a lack of energy, this is fairly routine as far as Woody Woodpecker cartoons go rather than the original manic energy. That Woody and Gabby are both under-characterised and their chemistry has been much stronger elsewhere undermines the conflict, and odd amusing moment not much is particularly funny, with lacklustre timing, not enough laughs and less than witty gags. Very little is done to give freshness to a story that was old-hat in animation long before Walter Lantz Studios adapted it with Woody starring and it just feels formulaic, bland and obvious.Just as problematic is the animation quality. Time and budget constraints shows in a lot of the animation, which is very rushed looking in the drawing and detail wise it's on the simplistic and careless side like many of Woody's cartoons from this period continuing through to the 60s.Summing up, like most of Woody and Gabby's cartoons but this is not one of them. 4/10 Bethany Cox

Additional information:

The Search Form


Rankings and Honors

Little Woody Riding Hood (1962) on IMDb
Internet Movie Database 5.7/10

Director:
Paul J. Smith

About the Movie Section

Most data and links to images for the Movies section come from TheMovieDB (TMDB).

Additional data for Film Titles come from The Open Movie Database (OMDb).

At least one plug-in comes from IMDb.

Data are -- hey, it's a plural -- subject to the limitations of their sources. (For example, TMDB search results currently max out at 20.) I am limiting myself to free data sources for now. (No, a "free trial" is not free.)

While much of the above data are retrieved directly from outside APIs and other such sources, data from American Film Institute (AFI) and British Film Institute (BFI) were manually entered the old fashioned way into a MySQL database. Re BFI I took the following liberties:

  • I added "runners up" to Top 10 lists, treating them as ties where applicable and numbering them accordingly at the bottom of each list.
  • Regarding those polls wherein "franchise" movies were submitted as one project until BFI's policy changed to regard them separately, I treated them as ties and renumbered the affected lists accordingly (e.g. the Godfather films).

Regarding profile removals and data corrections:

  • If you would like your profile removed from this site, please contact the source of this data directly, TheMovieDB. My assumption is: once it's gone from their site, it should soon be gone from this site.
  • If you would like to correct movie data on this site, please contact the source of this data directly, TheMovieDB. My assumption is: once it's corrected on their site, it should soon be corrected on this site.
  • For additional corrections and profile removals, please e-mail The Open Movie Database (OMDb).

Filtering is applied here to film projects flagged as "adult" by TheMovieDB. Pending "popular demand" I am contemplating a login and profile system with preferences (such as whether to allow adult images to appear) and permissions (such as data entry).

Whereas the overall purpose of this website is to serve as a personal demo/portfolio/workshop of web and data skills, this Movies section is not meant to compete with or substitute for far more definitive movie websites.

Whether or not he still clings to an award which he won in 1986 as a film critic for his college's newspaper, Jeffrey Hartmann is not responsible for the texts of overviews and biographies supplied by external data sources.